Daniel Bergé

1.6k citations
67 papers · 938 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Bergé

60 papers receiving 923 citations

Peers

Daniel Bergé
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 446
  • Biological Psychiatry 44
  • Clinical Psychology 175
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 164
  • Philosophy 81
Replace Ana M. Sánchez-Torres with:
Ana M. Sánchez-Torres Spain
Igor Bombín Spain
Carissa Coulston Australia
Elie Cheniaux Brazil
Ching‐Jui Chang Taiwan
J.-M. Azorin France
Rebecca Schennach Germany
Richard Cosway United Kingdom
Maria Elena Cinti Italy
Amanda McCleery United States
Daniel Bergé relative to Ana M. Sánchez-Torres Spain Ana M. Sánchez-Torres's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ana M. Sánchez-Torres · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Bergé

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Bergé's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Bergé with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Bergé more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Bergé

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Bergé. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Bergé. The network helps show where Daniel Bergé may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Bergé, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Bergé Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Bergé links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201084
2 200876
3 201573
4 200956
5 201450
6 201846
7 201544
8 201832
9 202030
10 201827
11 201726
12 200625
13 200724
14 202120
15 201719
16 201517
17 201317
18 201816
19 202015
20 202015

About Daniel Bergé

Daniel Bergé is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pharmacology, having authored 67 papers that have together received 938 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (40 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (11 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (8 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (5 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (4 papers) and Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (446 citations), Biological Psychiatry (44 citations), Clinical Psychology (175 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (164 citations) and Philosophy (81 citations). Daniel Bergé has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Antoni Bulbena, Víctor Pérez, Anna Mané, Óscar Vilarroya, P. Salgado, Susanna Carmona, Mariana Rovira, Miquel Bernardo, Clemente García‐Rizo and Emilio Fernández-Egea. Their work appears in journals such as European Neuropsychopharmacology, Psychiatry Research, European Psychiatry, Schizophrenia Research and Frontiers in Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact