European Addiction Research

978 papers and 21.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 978 papers published in European Addiction Research in the last decades have received a total of 21.1k indexed citations. Papers published in European Addiction Research usually cover Epidemiology (481 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (238 papers) and Clinical Psychology (201 papers) specifically the topics of Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (425 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (189 papers) and Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (107 papers). The most active scholars publishing in European Addiction Research are Jürgen Rehm, C. Hartgers, Hans‐Ulrich Wïttchen, Anna Kokkevi, Gerhard Gmel, Anne H. Berman, F. Schlyter, Hans Bergman, Tom Palmstierna and Wim van den Brink.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in European Addiction Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in European Addiction Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in European Addiction Research.

Countries where authors publish in European Addiction Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in European Addiction Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in European Addiction Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites European Addiction Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025