Biological Psychiatry

92.5k papers and 3.5M indexed citations i.

About

92.5k papers covering Biological Psychiatry have received a total of 3.5M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Tryptophan and brain disorders, Stress Responses and Cortisol and Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms and also cover the fields of Behavioral Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Psychiatry and Mental health. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Molecular Biology, Behavioral Neuroscience and Physiology. Some of the most active scholars covering Biological Psychiatry are Bruce S. McEwen, Michaël Maes, Andrew H. Miller, Timothy G. Dinan, Robert Dantzer, John F. Cryan, Charles B. Nemeroff, Lewis A. Opler, Abraham Fiszbein and Stanley R. Kay.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Biological Psychiatry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Biological Psychiatry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Biological Psychiatry.

Countries where authors publish papers about Biological Psychiatry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Biological Psychiatry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Biological Psychiatry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biological Psychiatry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025