Daniel S Pine

1.3k citations
17 papers · 384 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel S Pine

15 papers receiving 365 citations

Peers

Daniel S Pine
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 88
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 88
  • Clinical Psychology 109
  • Biological Psychiatry 11
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 30
Replace Melissa R. Weiner with:
Melissa R. Weiner United States
Kariina Laas Estonia
Hakon Heimer United States
Imanollah Bigdeli Iran
Margo Genderson United States
Jennifer A. Hranilovich United States
Kortni K. Meyers United States
Liv Vadskjaer Hjordt Denmark
Roman Linz Germany
Margaret A. Madigan United States
Daniel S Pine relative to Melissa R. Weiner United States Melissa R. Weiner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Melissa R. Weiner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel S Pine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel S Pine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel S Pine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel S Pine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel S Pine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel S Pine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel S Pine. The network helps show where Daniel S Pine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel S Pine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel S Pine Line = papers co-authored together Daniel S Pine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 199970
2 200766
3 199661
4 200153
5 200941
6 199925
7 199620
8 199415
9 200212
10 19997
11 20206
12 19955
13 20251
14 20191
15 20201
16 20250
17 20250

About Daniel S Pine

Daniel S Pine is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 17 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (2 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (88 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (88 citations), Clinical Psychology (109 citations), Biological Psychiatry (11 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (30 citations). Daniel S Pine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy D. Coplan, Jack M. Gorman, José Antônio Baddini Martínez, Donald F. Klein, David R. Shaffer, Devin T Mueller, Gregory J. Quirk, Lening Alexis Olivera-Figueroa, Gail A. Wasserman and J A Hatterer. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Biological Psychiatry, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychiatry Research and Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact