Behavioral Neuroscience

151.7k papers and 6.1M indexed citations i.

About

151.7k papers covering Behavioral Neuroscience have received a total of 6.1M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Stress Responses and Cortisol, Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior and Tryptophan and brain disorders and also cover the fields of Social Psychology, Biological Psychiatry and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Social Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Biological Psychiatry. Some of the most active scholars covering Behavioral Neuroscience are Bruce S. McEwen, Robert M. Sapolsky, George P. Chrousos, E. R. de Kloet, Clemens Kirschbaum, Michael J. Meaney, Joseph E. LeDoux, Charles B. Nemeroff, Wylie Vale and George F. Koob.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Behavioral Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Behavioral Neuroscience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Behavioral Neuroscience.

Countries where authors publish papers about Behavioral Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Behavioral Neuroscience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Behavioral Neuroscience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Behavioral Neuroscience more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025