Depression and Anxiety

3.0k papers and 145.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.0k papers published in Depression and Anxiety in the last decades have received a total of 145.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Depression and Anxiety usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.7k papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.3k papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (584 papers) specifically the topics of Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1.0k papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (847 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (501 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Depression and Anxiety are Jonathan Davidson, Kathryn M. Connor, Murray B. Stein, Charles B. Nemeroff, Hans‐Ulrich Wïttchen, Gordon J. G. Asmundson, Kerry J. Ressler, Michelle G. Craske, Stefan G. Hofmann and Terence M. Keane.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Depression and Anxiety

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Depression and Anxiety. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Depression and Anxiety.

Countries where authors publish in Depression and Anxiety

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Depression and Anxiety. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Depression and Anxiety with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Depression and Anxiety more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025