United States Department of the Navy

119.5k citations
6.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

United States Department of the Navy

5.2k papers receiving 109.1k citations

Peers

United States Department of the Navy
Comparison fields: 5 of 249
  • Oral Surgery 4.3k
  • Orthodontics 1.9k
  • Oceanography 5.2k
  • Toxicology 1.3k
  • Periodontics 1.6k
Replace University of Baltimore with:
University of Baltimore United States
United States Army United States
United States Department of the Army United States
United States Air Force United States
University of Maryland, Baltimore County United States
University of North Carolina Health Care United States
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine United States
University of North Carolina at Charlotte United States
Buffalo State University United States
Naval Medical Research Command United States
United States Department of the Navy relative to University of Baltimore United States University of Baltimore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
University of Baltimore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at United States Department of the Navy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United States Department of the Navy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United States Department of the Navy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United States Department of the Navy more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at United States Department of the Navy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United States Department of the Navy at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United States Department of the Navy at the time of their publication.

About United States Department of the Navy

In recent decades, authors affiliated with United States Department of the Navy have published 6.1k papers, which have received a total of 119.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 345 papers in Oceanography, 169 papers in Oral Surgery, 329 papers in Ocean Engineering, 478 papers in Aerospace Engineering and 67 papers in Orthodontics on the topics of Underwater Acoustics Research (243 papers), Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems (126 papers), Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications (74 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (67 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (67 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (67 papers), Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes (65 papers) and Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency (64 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Oral Surgery (4.3k citations), Orthodontics (1.9k citations), Oceanography (5.2k citations), Toxicology (1.3k citations) and Periodontics (1.6k citations). Authors at United States Department of the Navy collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, The Journal of the American Dental Association, Journal of Periodontology, The Astrophysical Journal and Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Some of United States Department of the Navy's most productive authors include Everette S. Gardner, Gordon M. Wenz, Robert S. Dietz, Janis A. Cannon‐Bowers, Eduardo Salas, Richard H. Rahe, John J. Grefenstette, Benjamin G. Harvey, Itzhak Brook and Gerald E. Larson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact