Orthodontics

191.1k papers and 4.0M indexed citations i.

About

191.1k papers covering Orthodontics have received a total of 4.0M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Dental materials and restorations, Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics and Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes and also cover the fields of Oral Surgery, Complementary and Manual Therapy and Biomedical Engineering. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Oral Surgery, Biomedical Engineering and Periodontics. Some of the most active scholars covering Orthodontics are Jack L. Ferracane, Franklin R. Tay, David H. Pashley, J.D.B. Featherstone, Bart Van Meerbeek, Matthias Kern, James A. McNamara, Mutlu Özcan, Michael V. Swain and Marco Ferrari.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Orthodontics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Orthodontics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Orthodontics.

Countries where authors publish papers about Orthodontics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Orthodontics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Orthodontics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Orthodontics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025