United States Army

459.9k citations
19.8k papers ·

Impact in

    • Cryospheric studies and observations
    • Climate change and permafrost
    • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
    • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
    • Occupational Health and Performance

Papers in

United States Army

17.8k papers receiving 425.3k citations

Peers

United States Army
Comparison fields: 5 of 250
  • Atmospheric Science 45.3k
  • Occupational Therapy 8.7k
  • Oral Surgery 10.3k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 21.2k
  • Earth-Surface Processes 10.6k
Replace West Virginia University with:
West Virginia University United States
Drexel University United States
Virginia Commonwealth University United States
Johns Hopkins Medicine United States
United States Department of the Army United States
East Carolina University United States
University of Ottawa Canada
University of Maryland, Baltimore County United States
In-Q-Tel United States
Catholic University of America United States
United States Army relative to West Virginia University United States West Virginia University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
West Virginia University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at United States Army

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United States Army. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United States Army with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United States Army more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at United States Army

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United States Army at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United States Army at the time of their publication.

About United States Army

In recent decades, authors affiliated with United States Army have published 19.8k papers, which have received a total of 459.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 414 papers in Occupational Therapy, 2.1k papers in Aerospace Engineering, 1.2k papers in Atmospheric Science, 427 papers in Oral Surgery and 459 papers in Earth-Surface Processes on the topics of Cryospheric studies and observations (602 papers), Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (531 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (458 papers), Geophysical Methods and Applications (397 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (389 papers), Climate change and permafrost (387 papers), Thermoregulation and physiological responses (386 papers) and Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (371 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Atmospheric Science (45.3k citations), Occupational Therapy (8.7k citations), Oral Surgery (10.3k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (21.2k citations) and Earth-Surface Processes (10.6k citations). Authors at United States Army collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Glaciology, SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Applied Optics, Journal of Applied Physiology and Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Some of United States Army's most productive authors include Bob G. Witmer, Fred A. Mael, Michael Jay Singer, Blake E. Ashforth, J. Weertman, Edgar L. Andreas, S. C. Colbeck, Anthony J. Gow, Matthew Sturm and Surindar Nath Bhaskar.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact