United States Army

457.8k citations
20.1k papers ·

Impact in

    • Cryospheric studies and observations
    • Climate change and permafrost
    • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
    • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
    • Occupational Health and Performance

Papers in

United States Army

18.0k papers receiving 424.4k citations

Peers

United States Army
Comparison fields: 5 of 250
  • Atmospheric Science 45.2k
  • Occupational Therapy 8.6k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 21.3k
  • Oral Surgery 9.9k
  • Rehabilitation 9.2k
Replace West Virginia University with:
West Virginia University United States
University of Maryland, Baltimore United States
United States Department of the Army United States
University of Maryland, Baltimore County United States
Catholic University of America United States
University of Baltimore United States
University of North Carolina at Charlotte United States
Old Dominion University United States
Marymount University United States
Université de Sherbrooke Canada
United States Army relative to West Virginia University United States West Virginia University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
West Virginia University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at United States Army

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United States Army. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United States Army with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United States Army more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at United States Army

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United States Army at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United States Army at the time of their publication.

About United States Army

In recent decades, authors affiliated with United States Army have published 20.1k papers, which have received a total of 457.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 432 papers in Occupational Therapy, 2.1k papers in Aerospace Engineering, 470 papers in Earth-Surface Processes, 1.2k papers in Atmospheric Science and 416 papers in Oral Surgery on the topics of Cryospheric studies and observations (606 papers), Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (528 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (465 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (407 papers), Geophysical Methods and Applications (404 papers), Climate change and permafrost (391 papers), Thermoregulation and physiological responses (385 papers) and Coastal and Marine Dynamics (380 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Atmospheric Science (45.2k citations), Occupational Therapy (8.6k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (21.3k citations), Oral Surgery (9.9k citations) and Rehabilitation (9.2k citations). Authors at United States Army collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Glaciology, SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Some of United States Army's most productive authors include Bob G. Witmer, Fred A. Mael, Michael J. Singer, Blake E. Ashforth, J. Weertman, Edgar L. Andreas, S. C. Colbeck, Matthew Sturm, Anthony J. Gow and Surindar N. Bhaskar.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact