United States Army

38.6k papers receiving 947.6k citations

Peers

United States Army
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Atmospheric Science 38.2k
  • Earth-Surface Processes 15.9k
  • Occupational Therapy 12.4k
  • Oral Surgery 11k
  • Mechanics of Materials 31k
Replace University at Buffalo, State University of New York with:
University at Buffalo, State University of New York United States
University of Connecticut United States
State University of New York United States
Western University Canada
McMaster University Canada
West Virginia University United States
University of Ottawa Canada
Queen's University Canada
Virginia Tech United States
University of Cincinnati United States
United States Army relative to University at Buffalo, State University of New York United States University at Buffalo, State University of New York's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at United States Army

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United States Army. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United States Army with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United States Army more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at United States Army

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United States Army at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United States Army at the time of their publication.

About United States Army

In recent decades, authors affiliated with United States Army have published 40.7k papers, which have received a total of 949.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 3.2k papers in Aerospace Engineering, 847 papers in Earth-Surface Processes, 645 papers in Occupational Therapy, 1.6k papers in Mechanics of Materials and 449 papers in Oral Surgery on the topics of Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (897 papers), Coastal and Marine Dynamics (710 papers), Thermoregulation and physiological responses (615 papers), Advanced Measurement and Detection Methods (581 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (575 papers), Advanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials (546 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (495 papers) and Military Strategy and Technology (450 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Atmospheric Science (38.2k citations), Earth-Surface Processes (15.9k citations), Occupational Therapy (12.4k citations), Oral Surgery (11k citations) and Mechanics of Materials (31k citations). Authors at United States Army collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Applied Optics, Optical Engineering, Journal of Applied Physiology and Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Some of United States Army's most productive authors include Sheng Shui Zhang, Fred A. Mael, Blake E. Ashforth, Igor Linkov, Matthew Sturm, Michael N. Sawka, Harris R. Lieberman, Charles W. Hoge, Carl Andrew Castro and Jonathan P. Dowling.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact