National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Impact in
- Instrumentation top 2%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Papers in
- Instrumentation 135
-
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 181
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 153
- Top scholars
- Paul C. SternThomas DietzBarney CohenJiujun ZhangFabrizio SebastianiAndrea EsuliMichael L. KleinShūichi Nosé
- Journals
- The Astrophysical Journal (193 papers)Journal of Limnology (106 papers)Nature (104 papers)Journal of Biological Chemistry (89 papers)Medical Physics (76 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaItaly
In The Last Decade
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
12.8k papers receiving 436.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 250
- Instrumentation 5.0k
- Molecular Biology 78.2k
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 18.6k
- Global and Planetary Change 23.6k
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 14.2k
Countries citing scholars working at National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at the time of their publication.
About National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine have published 13.7k papers, which have received a total of 458.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 135 papers in Instrumentation, 595 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 605 papers in Atmospheric Science, 946 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 488 papers in Spectroscopy on the topics of Photonic and Optical Devices (193 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (182 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (181 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (167 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (166 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (162 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (159 papers) and Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (153 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Instrumentation (5.0k citations), Molecular Biology (78.2k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (18.6k citations), Global and Planetary Change (23.6k citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (14.2k citations). Authors at National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including The Astrophysical Journal, Journal of Limnology, Nature, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Medical Physics. Some of National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's most productive authors include Paul C. Stern, Thomas Dietz, Barney Cohen, Jiujun Zhang, Fabrizio Sebastiani, Andrea Esuli, Michael L. Klein, Shūichi Nosé, Duncan R. Stewart and J. Joshua Yang.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.