National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Impact in
- Instrumentation top 2%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Papers in
- Instrumentation 137
-
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 189
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 151
- Top scholars
- Paul C. SternThomas M. DietzBarney CohenFabrizio SebastianiAndrea EsuliJiujun J. ZhangMichael Lawrence KleinShūichi Nosé
- Journals
- The Astrophysical Journal (197 papers)Nature (114 papers)Journal of Limnology (105 papers)Canadian Journal of Chemistry (96 papers)Journal of Biological Chemistry (95 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaItaly
In The Last Decade
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
13.4k papers receiving 489.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
- Instrumentation 5.5k
- Molecular Biology 89.5k
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 21.8k
- Global and Planetary Change 25.3k
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 15.8k
Countries citing scholars working at National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at the time of their publication.
About National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine have published 14.4k papers, which have received a total of 515.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 137 papers in Instrumentation, 588 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 600 papers in Atmospheric Science, 984 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 2.1k papers in Molecular Biology on the topics of Photonic and Optical Devices (199 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (196 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (193 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (189 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (172 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (162 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (159 papers) and Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (151 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Instrumentation (5.5k citations), Molecular Biology (89.5k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (21.8k citations), Global and Planetary Change (25.3k citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (15.8k citations). Authors at National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including The Astrophysical Journal, Nature, Journal of Limnology, Canadian Journal of Chemistry and Journal of Biological Chemistry. Some of National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's most productive authors include Paul C. Stern, Thomas M. Dietz, Barney Cohen, Fabrizio Sebastiani, Andrea Esuli, Jiujun J. Zhang, Michael Lawrence Klein, Shūichi Nosé, Duncan R. Stewart and Jianhua Joshua Yang.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.