Journal of Analytical Toxicology

4.4k papers and 90.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.4k papers published in Journal of Analytical Toxicology in the last decades have received a total of 90.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Analytical Toxicology usually cover Toxicology (2.1k papers), Spectroscopy (914 papers) and Pharmacology (864 papers) specifically the topics of Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (2.1k papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (687 papers) and Poisoning and overdose treatments (549 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Analytical Toxicology are Edward J. Cone, Yale H. Caplan, Barry K. Logan, Barry Levine, Alan Wayne Jones, Alphonse Poklis, Bruce A. Goldberger, Mahmoud A. ElSohly, Pascal Kintz and Marilyn A. Huestis.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Analytical Toxicology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Analytical Toxicology.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Analytical Toxicology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Analytical Toxicology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Analytical Toxicology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Analytical Toxicology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025