University of North Carolina at Charlotte

683.6k citations
27.9k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University of North Carolina at Charlotte

24.6k papers receiving 632.8k citations

Peers

University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 28.6k
  • Clinical Psychology 49.2k
  • Safety Research 15.7k
  • Social Psychology 37.2k
  • Applied Psychology 8.2k
Replace North Carolina State University with:
North Carolina State University United States
Clemson University United States
University of Tennessee at Knoxville United States
Wake Forest University United States
Virginia Tech United States
West Virginia University United States
East Carolina University United States
University of South Carolina United States
Auburn University United States
Virginia Commonwealth University United States
University of North Carolina at Charlotte relative to North Carolina State University United States North Carolina State University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
North Carolina State University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of North Carolina at Charlotte. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of North Carolina at Charlotte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of North Carolina at Charlotte more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of North Carolina at Charlotte at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of North Carolina at Charlotte at the time of their publication.

About University of North Carolina at Charlotte

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of North Carolina at Charlotte have published 27.9k papers, which have received a total of 683.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 745 papers in Safety Research, 1.1k papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 1.5k papers in Clinical Psychology, 1.5k papers in Social Psychology and 484 papers in Transportation on the topics of Disability Education and Employment (375 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (361 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (320 papers), Microgrid Control and Optimization (304 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (285 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (284 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (259 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (243 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (28.6k citations), Clinical Psychology (49.2k citations), Safety Research (15.7k citations), Social Psychology (37.2k citations) and Applied Psychology (8.2k citations). Authors at University of North Carolina at Charlotte collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Precision Engineering, Scientific Reports, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications and CIRP Annals. Some of University of North Carolina at Charlotte's most productive authors include Zbigniew Michalewicz, Lawrence G. Calhoun, Richard G. Tedeschi, James D. Oliver, Moutaz Khouja, Inna M. Sokolova, Roslyn Arlin Mickelson, Richard G. Tedeschi, Yu Wang and Ian Marriott.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact