Buffalo State University
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
Papers in
-
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 142
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 120
-
- Creativity in Education and Neuroscience 93
- Top scholars
- Irving BiedermanRobert J. BarroJames E. MarciaJennifer CrockerBrenda MajorPhilip L. YèagleDean G. PruittJiali Gao
- Journals
- Journal of Great Lakes Research (53 papers)Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (51 papers)Journal of Biological Chemistry (45 papers)Journal of Structural Engineering (44 papers)The Journal of Creative Behavior (37 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaCanada
In The Last Decade
Buffalo State University
8.1k papers receiving 282.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 14.9k
- Applied Psychology 5.0k
- Clinical Psychology 20.6k
- Social Psychology 19.4k
- Sensory Systems 4.1k
Countries citing scholars working at Buffalo State University
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Buffalo State University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Buffalo State University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Buffalo State University more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Buffalo State University
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Buffalo State University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Buffalo State University at the time of their publication.
About Buffalo State University
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Buffalo State University have published 9.2k papers, which have received a total of 317.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 507 papers in Clinical Psychology, 322 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 280 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 444 papers in Social Psychology and 95 papers in Sensory Systems on the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (142 papers), Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (134 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (129 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (120 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (93 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (88 papers), Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (82 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (74 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (14.9k citations), Applied Psychology (5.0k citations), Clinical Psychology (20.6k citations), Social Psychology (19.4k citations) and Sensory Systems (4.1k citations). Authors at Buffalo State University collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Great Lakes Research, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Structural Engineering and The Journal of Creative Behavior. Some of Buffalo State University's most productive authors include Irving Biederman, Robert J. Barro, James E. Marcia, Jennifer Crocker, Brenda Major, Philip L. Yèagle, Dean G. Pruitt, Jiali Gao, Jie Zhang and Joan Bybee.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.