United States Air Force

5.8k papers receiving 145.7k citations

Peers

United States Air Force
Comparison fields: 5 of 248
  • Orthodontics 2.8k
  • Oral Surgery 3.8k
  • Virology 1.9k
  • Aerospace Engineering 11.1k
  • General Dentistry 591
Replace United States Department of the Army with:
United States Department of the Army United States
University of Baltimore United States
United States Army United States
United States Department of the Navy United States
University of North Carolina Health Care United States
Naval Medical Research Command United States
Triangle United States
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine United States
Providence College United States
Battelle United States
United States Air Force relative to United States Department of the Army United States United States Department of the Army's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
United States Department of the Army · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at United States Air Force

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United States Air Force. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United States Air Force with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United States Air Force more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at United States Air Force

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United States Air Force at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United States Air Force at the time of their publication.

About United States Air Force

In recent decades, authors affiliated with United States Air Force have published 6.7k papers, which have received a total of 161.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 891 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 102 papers in Orthodontics, 101 papers in Occupational Therapy, 33 papers in General Dentistry and 134 papers in Oral Surgery on the topics of Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (211 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (143 papers), Aerospace and Aviation Technology (130 papers), Rocket and propulsion systems research (98 papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (94 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (91 papers), Spaceflight effects on biology (88 papers) and Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (87 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Orthodontics (2.8k citations), Oral Surgery (3.8k citations), Virology (1.9k citations), Aerospace Engineering (11.1k citations) and General Dentistry (591 citations). Authors at United States Air Force collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of Urology, AIAA Journal, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of Aircraft and The Journal of the American Dental Association. Some of United States Air Force's most productive authors include Fred H. Previc, Víctor A. Convertino, Steven M. Rinaldi, J.P. Peerenboom, Terrence Kelly, Stanley G. Schultz, Ralph Zalusky, K. K. Bajaj, Richard H. Anderson and David R. King.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact