Ulrike Böcker

49 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Ulrike Böcker
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Animal Science and Zoology 690
  • Analytical Chemistry 277
  • Biophysics 143
  • Food Science 405
  • Insect Science 171
Replace Weiqing Sun with:
Weiqing Sun China
Akinbode A. Adedeji United States
Lei Zheng China
Rodrigo Stephani Brazil
Stéphane Portanguen France
Shengming Zhao China
N. Prieto Canada
Elling‐Olav Rukke Norway
Alain Kondjoyan France
Mette Marie Løkke Denmark
Ulrike Böcker relative to Weiqing Sun China Weiqing Sun's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×38.5×
Weiqing Sun · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ulrike Böcker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ulrike Böcker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ulrike Böcker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ulrike Böcker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ulrike Böcker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ulrike Böcker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ulrike Böcker. The network helps show where Ulrike Böcker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ulrike Böcker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ulrike Böcker Line = papers co-authored together Ulrike Böcker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006132
2 2008105
3 2006102
4 200782
5 202173
6 201766
7 200665
8 201761
9 201054
10 202247
11 200746
12 201945
13 200943
14 201941
15 202139
16 201937
17 202037
18 200937
19 201935
20 200835

About Ulrike Böcker

Ulrike Böcker is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Analytical Chemistry and Food Science, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (27 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (14 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (9 papers), Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (9 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (7 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (7 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (5 papers) and Collagen: Extraction and Characterization (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (690 citations), Analytical Chemistry (277 citations), Biophysics (143 citations), Food Science (405 citations) and Insect Science (171 citations). Ulrike Böcker has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ragni Ofstad, Achim Köhler, Nils Kristian Afseth, Sileshi Gizachew Wubshet, Hanne Christine Bertram, Diana Lindberg, Henrik J. Andersen, Zhiyun Wu, Ingrid Måge and Anne Rieder. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Journal of Cereal Science, Food Chemistry, Journal of Biophotonics and Food Control.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact