Tim Thornton

57 papers receiving 682 citations

Peers

Tim Thornton
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Philosophy 324
  • Family Practice 26
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 167
  • Clinical Psychology 212
  • Neurology 63
Replace Peter Brook with:
Peter Brook United Kingdom
Nick Shryane United Kingdom
David Nicholls New Zealand
Ravi Paul Zambia
Dylan Evans United Kingdom
Richard J. Budd United Kingdom
Michael Langenbach Germany
Christopher Slobogin United States
Paola Iannello Italy
Lucas de Francisco Carvalho Brazil
Tim Thornton relative to Peter Brook United Kingdom Peter Brook's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Peter Brook · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Thornton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Thornton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Thornton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Thornton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Thornton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Thornton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Thornton. The network helps show where Tim Thornton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tim Thornton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim Thornton Line = papers co-authored together Tim Thornton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Tacit Knowledge
2013124
2 2006122
3 200659
4
Looking with both eyes open: fact and value in psychiatric diagnosis?
200552
5 200746
6 201030
7 200424
8 200518
9 201517
10
Mental Illness and Reductionism: Can Functions be Naturalized?
200016
11 201916
12 200716
13 202114
14 202213
15 201013
16 200213
17 201413
18 201512
19 201411
20 199811

About Tim Thornton

Tim Thornton is a scholar working on Philosophy, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 62 papers that have together received 810 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (27 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (7 papers), Neurology and Historical Studies (7 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Ethics in medical practice (5 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (5 papers) and Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (324 citations), Family Practice (26 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (167 citations), Clinical Psychology (212 citations) and Neurology (63 citations). Tim Thornton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Neil Gascoigne, K. W. M. Fulford, George Graham, Peter Lucas, Giovanni Stanghellini, Matthew R. Broome, Maree L. Hackett, Natalie Banner, Catherine Elizabeth Lightbody and Michael J Leathley. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology, Medicine Health Care and Philosophy, Journal of Medical Ethics, Qualitative Health Research and Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact