Ed Peile

2.4k citations
52 papers · 1.6k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Ed Peile

44 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Ed Peile
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Family Practice 105
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 67
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 530
  • Research and Theory 12
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 43
Replace Jack D. McCue with:
Jack D. McCue United States
John Yaphe Portugal
Mark Bounthavong United States
Rolf Wahlström Sweden
Tareq L. Mukattash Jordan
Nicola Brennan United Kingdom
J. G. R. Howie United Kingdom
Cheong Lieng Teng Malaysia
Timothy J. Ives United States
Erica R. Pryor United States
Ed Peile relative to Jack D. McCue United States Jack D. McCue's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×12.3×
Jack D. McCue · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ed Peile

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ed Peile's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ed Peile with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ed Peile more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ed Peile

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ed Peile. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ed Peile. The network helps show where Ed Peile may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ed Peile, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ed Peile Line = papers co-authored together Ed Peile links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020236
2 2013230
3 2013138
4 2010130
5 201283
6 201072
7 201170
8 201167
9 201863
10 201263
11
How prepared are medical graduates to begin practice ? a comparison of three diverse UK medical schools. Final report to GMC April 2008.
200859
12 201354
13 201249
14 198634
15 201727
16 200725
17 201423
18 197913
19 201212
20 201012

About Ed Peile

Ed Peile is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Family Practice, Psychiatry and Mental health and Philosophy, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (15 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (7 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (6 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (5 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (3 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (105 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (67 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (530 citations), Research and Theory (12 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (43 citations). Ed Peile has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Neil Johnson, Vimmi Passi, K. W. M. Fulford, Jill Thistlethwaite, Heidi Carroll, Zoé Paskins, Scott M. Wright, Fred Hafferty, Maggie Allen and Samantha Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Teacher, Clinical Medicine, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Journal of Interprofessional Care and Frontiers in Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact