Andreas De Block

41 papers receiving 454 citations

Peers

Andreas De Block
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • General Psychology 13
  • History and Philosophy of Science 34
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 81
  • Philosophy 73
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 72
Replace Orlando Lourenço with:
Orlando Lourenço Portugal
Bernard Andrieu France
Constantina Papoulias United Kingdom
Gunnar Breivik Norway
Martha Kenney United States
Hermann Schmitz Germany
Bernard Kaplan United States
Erazim Kohák Czechia
Mary Bryden United Kingdom
Russil Durrant New Zealand
Andreas De Block relative to Orlando Lourenço Portugal Orlando Lourenço's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
Orlando Lourenço · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andreas De Block

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andreas De Block's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andreas De Block with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andreas De Block more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andreas De Block

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andreas De Block. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andreas De Block. The network helps show where Andreas De Block may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andreas De Block, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andreas De Block Line = papers co-authored together Andreas De Block links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011117
2 201378
3 200934
4 201527
5 202025
6 202225
7 201322
8 202117
9 200615
10 200615
11
The Dynamics of Science: Computational Frontiers in History and Philosophy of Science
202012
12 200510
13 201010
14 20249
15 20159
16 19948
17 20237
18 20047
19 20086
20 20116

About Andreas De Block

Andreas De Block is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 506 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (12 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (9 papers), Language and cultural evolution (5 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (5 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (13 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (34 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (81 citations), Philosophy (73 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (72 citations). Andreas De Block has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yannick Joye, Siegfried Dewitte, Grant Ramsey, P. Adriaens, Jonathan Sholl, Mario Gellrich, Uwe Peters, Nathan Honeycutt, Lee Jussim and Stijn Conix. Their work appears in journals such as Perspectives in biology and medicine, Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology, Philosophical Psychology, Biological Theory and Environmental Values.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact