Bob Brecher

651 citations
43 papers · 313 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Bob Brecher

36 papers receiving 258 citations

Peers

Bob Brecher
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Philosophy 65
  • Political Science and International Relations 88
  • Sociology and Political Science 139
  • Gender Studies 22
  • General Health Professions 49
Replace Samantha Brennan with:
Samantha Brennan Canada
Soran Reader United Kingdom
Claudia Mills United States
Joan C. Callahan United States
Lisa Sowle Cahill United States
Richard L. Lippke United States
Michael Richards United Kingdom
Ben Saunders United Kingdom
Meir Dan‐Cohen United States
Thomas F. Tierney United States
Bob Brecher relative to Samantha Brennan Canada Samantha Brennan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Samantha Brennan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bob Brecher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bob Brecher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bob Brecher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bob Brecher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bob Brecher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bob Brecher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bob Brecher. The network helps show where Bob Brecher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bob Brecher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bob Brecher Line = papers co-authored together Bob Brecher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200780
2 201472
3 199020
4 201317
5 200215
6 201411
7
Getting What You Want: A Critique of Liberal Morality
199711
8 201010
9 20129
10 20058
11 20047
12 20036
13 19905
14 20164
15 20094
16
Education Elitism and the Market
19963
17
Liberalism and the new Europe
19933
18 19763
19 19872
20 20142

About Bob Brecher

Bob Brecher is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, General Health Professions and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 43 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Torture, Ethics, and Law (6 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (5 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (4 papers), Ethics in medical practice (4 papers), International Law and Human Rights (3 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (3 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (3 papers) and Higher Education Governance and Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (65 citations), Political Science and International Relations (88 citations), Sociology and Political Science (139 citations), Gender Studies (22 citations) and General Health Professions (49 citations). Bob Brecher has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tom Hickey, Ron Beadle, John E. Edwards, John O’Neill, K. W. M. Fulford, Michael Loughlin, Vicente Ordóñez, Wendy Lipworth, Ross Upshur and Ed Peile. Their work appears in journals such as Araucaria, Nursing Ethics, Ethics and Social Welfare, Journal of Applied Philosophy and Health Care Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact