Mona Gupta

21 papers receiving 169 citations

Peers

Mona Gupta
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Family Practice 8
  • Philosophy 38
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 19
  • General Psychology 3
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 3
Replace Sobia Khan with:
Sobia Khan United Kingdom
Kirsten Barnes Australia
Scott Sehon United States
R. Gaupp Germany
Tony V Pham United States
Wim Distelmans Belgium
Happy Kuy‐Lok Tan Taiwan
Lyndon Amorin-Woods Australia
Tamar Koch United Kingdom
Cavin P. Leeman United States
Mona Gupta relative to Sobia Khan United Kingdom Sobia Khan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Sobia Khan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mona Gupta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mona Gupta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mona Gupta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mona Gupta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mona Gupta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mona Gupta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mona Gupta. The network helps show where Mona Gupta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mona Gupta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mona Gupta Line = papers co-authored together Mona Gupta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200733
2 201732
3 201227
4 201426
5 200913
6 200912
7 20198
8 20225
9
Psychiatry and Evidence-Based Psychiatry: A Distinction with a Difference
20124
10 20024
11 20233
12 20233
13 20233
14 20133
15 20232
16 20232
17 20221
18 20241
19
[What is 'evidence' in psychiatry?].
20111
20 20151

About Mona Gupta

Mona Gupta is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Philosophy, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 26 papers that have together received 187 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (12 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (11 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (6 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (2 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (8 citations), Philosophy (38 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (19 citations), General Psychology (3 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (3 citations). Mona Gupta has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Rupesh Raina, Vinod Krishnappa, Mellar P. Davis, Susan B. LeGrand, Ruth Lagman, Declan Walsh, Sayani Banerjee, Nancy Nyquist Potter, Alexander I. F. Simpson and Donna E. Stewart. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry and BMC Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact