Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health1.6k
Psychiatry and Mental health578
General Health Professions671
Health Informatics57
Clinical Psychology505
Replace BioSocieties with:
BioSocietiesUnited Kingdom
New Genetics and SocietyUnited Kingdom
Social Theory & HealthUnited Kingdom
Global Advances in Health and MedicineUnited States
Anthropology and MedicineUnited Kingdom
Perspectives in Clinical ResearchIndia
Public health reviewsUnited States
Public Health EthicsUnited Kingdom
British Journal of PainUnited Kingdom
The PsychiatristUnited Kingdom
Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicinerelative toBioSocietiesUnited KingdomBioSocieties's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
BioSocieties · 1×
×1.02k/2kPHEOH
×1.5578/388PMH
×0.7671/1kGHP
×0.957/64HI
×0.8505/643CP
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine
This network shows the impact of papers published in Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine.
About Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.