Peter Gerjets

8.1k citations
190 papers · 6.2k · h-index 44

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Gerjets

174 papers receiving 5.7k citations

Peers

Peter Gerjets
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.7k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 2.4k
  • Human-Computer Interaction 866
  • Computer Science Applications 408
  • Health Informatics 87
Replace Mitchell J. Nathan with:
Mitchell J. Nathan United States
Katharina Scheiter Germany
Halszka Jarodzka Netherlands
Olusola Adesope United States
Paul Ayres Australia
Slava Kalyuga Australia
Evan F. Risko Canada
Detlev Leutner Germany
Logan Fiorella United States
Valerie J. Shute United States
Peter Gerjets relative to Mitchell J. Nathan United States Mitchell J. Nathan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.1×
Mitchell J. Nathan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Gerjets

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Gerjets's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Gerjets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Gerjets more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Gerjets

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Gerjets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Gerjets. The network helps show where Peter Gerjets may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Gerjets, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Gerjets Line = papers co-authored together Peter Gerjets links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 190 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009327
2 2009310
3 2007278
4 2012192
5 2004187
6 2009182
7 2019179
8 2010153
9 2006142
10 2012139
11 2003136
12 2017132
13 2023128
14 2008116
15 2014115
16 2012108
17 200999
18 201593
19 200889
20 201189

About Peter Gerjets

Peter Gerjets is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Education and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 190 papers that have together received 6.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (76 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (42 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (29 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (24 papers), Online and Blended Learning (19 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (17 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (16 papers) and Misinformation and Its Impacts (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (2.7k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (2.4k citations), Human-Computer Interaction (866 citations), Computer Science Applications (408 citations) and Health Informatics (87 citations). Peter Gerjets has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Katharina Scheiter, Yvonne Kammerer, Halszka Jarodzka, Tamara van Gog, Richard Catrambone, Gabriele Cierniak, Christian Scharinger, Friedrich W. Hesse, Wolfgang Rosenstiel and Tim Kühl. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, Learning and Instruction, Educational Psychology Review, Frontiers in Psychology and Computers & Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact