Thomas H. Stone

65 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Thomas H. Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 712
  • Safety Research 409
  • Information Systems and Management 314
  • Social Psychology 445
  • Health Informatics 25
Replace Randi L. Sims with:
Randi L. Sims United States
Sean Valentine United States
Krista L. Uggerslev Canada
Cheryl L. Adkins United States
Justin M. Berg United States
Kevin W. Rockmann United States
Yuhui Li China
Peter E. Mudrack United States
Marie T. Dasborough United States
Flora F. T. Chiang Hong Kong
Thomas H. Stone relative to Randi L. Sims United States Randi L. Sims's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Randi L. Sims · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas H. Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas H. Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas H. Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas H. Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas H. Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas H. Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas H. Stone. The network helps show where Thomas H. Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas H. Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas H. Stone Line = papers co-authored together Thomas H. Stone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007229
2 1973178
3 2007167
4 2010152
5 1973145
6 2009121
7 199879
8 200571
9 199366
10 201157
11 197148
12 201038
13 201628
14 202123
15 201521
16 201319
17 199217
18 200417
19 199216
20 197916

About Thomas H. Stone

Thomas H. Stone is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Safety Research and General Health Professions, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (20 papers), Academic integrity and plagiarism (8 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (8 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (6 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (5 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (5 papers), Canadian Identity and History (5 papers) and Indigenous Studies and Ecology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (712 citations), Safety Research (409 citations), Information Systems and Management (314 citations), Social Psychology (445 citations) and Health Informatics (25 citations). Thomas H. Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include I. M. Jawahar, Jennifer L. Kisamore, L. L. Cummings, Donald P. Schwab, Mary Ann Hocutt, Ij. Hetty van Emmerik, Abraham K. Korman, Charles R. Williams, Edward J. Conlon and John C. Mowen. Their work appears in journals such as Career Development International, Journal of Applied Psychology, Academy of Management Review, Administrative Science Quarterly and Ethnohistory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact