Shaoling Yang

803 citations
26 papers · 624 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Shaoling Yang

24 papers receiving 613 citations

Peers

Shaoling Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Animal Science and Zoology 271
  • Food Science 226
  • Aquatic Science 64
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 131
  • Biotechnology 40
Replace Libo Qi with:
Libo Qi China
Shota Tanimoto Japan
WU Yan-yan China
Juncai Tu China
Lin Wanling China
Dequan Zhang China
Min Soo Heu South Korea
Xiaoguo Ying China
Shuji Liu China
Shaoling Yang relative to Libo Qi China Libo Qi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Libo Qi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Shaoling Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shaoling Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shaoling Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shaoling Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shaoling Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shaoling Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shaoling Yang. The network helps show where Shaoling Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Shaoling Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Shaoling Yang Line = papers co-authored together Shaoling Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020167
2 2021128
3 201673
4 202339
5 202133
6 202226
7 202025
8 201524
9 201920
10 202413
11 202213
12 202113
13 201811
14 20169
15 20258
16
Mechanism underlying protein changes during processing and gelation of sea bass surimi.
20204
17 20224
18 20184
19 20162
20 20242

About Shaoling Yang

Shaoling Yang is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Molecular Biology, Aquatic Science, Food Science and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 624 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (10 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (5 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (4 papers), Food Quality and Safety Studies (3 papers), Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis (3 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (3 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (2 papers) and Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (271 citations), Food Science (226 citations), Aquatic Science (64 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (131 citations) and Biotechnology (40 citations). Shaoling Yang has collaborated with scholars based in China, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Laihao Li, Chunsheng Li, Yongqiang Zhao, Yueqi Wang, Yanyan Wu, Shengjun Chen, Xianqing Yang, Jianwei Cen, Daqiao Yang and Yingying Shen. Their work appears in journals such as Food Chemistry, Gels, Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, Scientific Reports and Food Research International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact