Shane Walker
Impact in
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Food Science top 2%
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
- Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
Papers in
-
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods 6
- Fermentation and Sensory Analysis 1
-
- Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management 5
- Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies 5
- Horticultural and Viticultural Research 2
- Co-authors
- Anne Gunson (5 shared papers)F. Roger Harker (3 shared papers)Shona Murray (2 shared papers)Ken Marsh (4 shared papers)H. Young (1 shared paper)John H. Maindonald (1 shared paper)Ian C. Hallett (1 shared paper)John Prescott (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Sensory Studies (3 papers)Postharvest Biology and Technology (3 papers)Food Quality and Preference (2 papers)International Journal of Food Science & Technology (1 paper)Acta Horticulturae (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandCanadaDenmark
In The Last Decade
Shane Walker
12 papers receiving 885 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Biochemistry 141
- Food Science 428
- Plant Science 622
- Nutrition and Dietetics 177
- Sensory Systems 54
Countries citing papers authored by Shane Walker
This map shows the geographic impact of Shane Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shane Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shane Walker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Shane Walker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shane Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shane Walker. The network helps show where Shane Walker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Shane Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 267 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 256 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 130 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 94 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 91 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 42 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 0 |
About Shane Walker
Shane Walker is a scholar working on Food Science, Plant Science, Nutrition and Dietetics, Civil and Structural Engineering and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 978 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (6 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (5 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (5 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (3 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (2 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (1 paper), Meat and Animal Product Quality (1 paper) and Material Properties and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (141 citations), Food Science (428 citations), Plant Science (622 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (177 citations) and Sensory Systems (54 citations). Shane Walker has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Canada and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Anne Gunson, F. Roger Harker, Shona Murray, Ken Marsh, H. Young, John H. Maindonald, Ian C. Hallett, John Prescott, Elspeth MacRae and Joanna Gamble. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Sensory Studies, Postharvest Biology and Technology, Food Quality and Preference, International Journal of Food Science & Technology and Acta Horticulturae.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.