Sarah Wright

36 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Sarah Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 781
  • Demography 259
  • Social Psychology 440
  • Research and Theory 9
  • General Health Professions 243
Replace Sara Jansen Perry with:
Sara Jansen Perry United States
Margaret C. McKee Canada
Hetty van Emmerik Netherlands
Kathryn H. Dekas United States
Jacoba Lilius Canada
M. Gloria González‐Morales Canada
David J. Prottas United States
Bill George United States
Dawn E. Chandler United States
Gretchen R. Vogelgesang United States
Sarah Wright relative to Sara Jansen Perry United States Sara Jansen Perry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sara Jansen Perry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Wright. The network helps show where Sarah Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah Wright Line = papers co-authored together Sarah Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012245
2
Loneliness in the Workplace: Construct Definition and Scale Development.
2006197
3 2020144
4 2020122
5 2016117
6 201895
7 200764
8 201949
9 201347
10 201547
11 201146
12 201641
13 201330
14 201827
15 200820
16 200519
17 201518
18 202016
19 202215
20 202115

About Sarah Wright

Sarah Wright is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Demography, General Health Professions and Social Psychology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (16 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (7 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (5 papers), Workplace Spirituality and Leadership (5 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (4 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (3 papers) and Psychology of Social Influence (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (781 citations), Demography (259 citations), Social Psychology (440 citations), Research and Theory (9 citations) and General Health Professions (243 citations). Sarah Wright has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Marjolein Lips‐Wiersma, Anthony Silard, K. T. Strongman, Christopher D. B. Burt, Emily Heaphy, Ryan K. Gottfredson, Kathy Lund Dean, Bryan J. Dik, Jarrod Haar and Helena D. Cooper–Thomas. Their work appears in journals such as American Water Works Association, Higher Education, Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, Group & Organization Management and The Leadership Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact