Robert A. Stenning
Impact in
- Biotechnology top 2%
- Microbial Inactivation Methods
- Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
- Food Science top 5%
- Proteins in Food Systems
- Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Advanced Scientific Research Methods
Papers in
-
- Proteins in Food Systems 3
-
- Microbial Inactivation Methods 1
- Co-authors
- Eric C. Needs (2 shared papers)Gillian T. Rich (1 shared paper)V. Ferragut (1 shared paper)B. E. Brooker (4 shared papers)Bernard M. Mackey (1 shared paper)N. S. ISAACS (1 shared paper)Alistair Steven Grandison (2 shared papers)Barbaros Özer (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Biochemical Society Transactions (1 paper)Enzyme and Microbial Technology (1 paper)Nature Biotechnology (1 paper)Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture (1 paper)Letters in Applied Microbiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomTürkiyeSpain
In The Last Decade
Robert A. Stenning
8 papers receiving 366 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Biotechnology 165
- Food Science 179
- Plant Science 77
- Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 6
- Animal Science and Zoology 5
Countries citing papers authored by Robert A. Stenning
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert A. Stenning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert A. Stenning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert A. Stenning more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert A. Stenning
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert A. Stenning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert A. Stenning. The network helps show where Robert A. Stenning may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Robert A. Stenning, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 161 | |
| 2 | 1994 | 79 | |
| 3 | 1994 | 78 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 30 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 14 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 1 |
About Robert A. Stenning
Robert A. Stenning is a scholar working on Food Science, Biotechnology, Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering and Plant Science, having authored 8 papers that have together received 413 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Proteins in Food Systems (3 papers), Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (2 papers), Microbial Inactivation Methods (1 paper), Biofuel production and bioconversion (1 paper) and Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (165 citations), Food Science (179 citations), Plant Science (77 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (6 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (5 citations). Robert A. Stenning has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Türkiye and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Eric C. Needs, Gillian T. Rich, V. Ferragut, B. E. Brooker, Bernard M. Mackey, N. S. ISAACS, Alistair Steven Grandison, Barbaros Özer, Colin R. Bird and Wolfgang Schuch. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Society Transactions, Enzyme and Microbial Technology, Nature Biotechnology, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture and Letters in Applied Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.