Nature Biotechnology

9.1k papers and 995.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 9.1k papers published in Nature Biotechnology in the last decades have received a total of 995.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Nature Biotechnology usually cover Molecular Biology (4.4k papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.3k papers) and Genetics (949 papers) specifically the topics of CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (1.1k papers), Biotechnology and Related Fields (1.1k papers) and Science, Research, and Medicine (616 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nature Biotechnology are Matthias Mann, Jürgen Cox, Steven L. Salzberg, William Stafford Noble, Lior Pachter, Anthony Atala, Markus Schuelke, Gary Walsh, Jeffrey A. Hubbell and J. Keith Joung.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nature Biotechnology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nature Biotechnology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nature Biotechnology.

Countries where authors publish in Nature Biotechnology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nature Biotechnology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nature Biotechnology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nature Biotechnology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025