Peter Steane

1.5k citations
65 papers · 1.1k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Steane

62 papers receiving 892 citations

Peers

Peter Steane
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Public Administration 106
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 227
  • Strategy and Management 304
  • Research and Theory 11
  • Management Information Systems 127
Replace Suzanne Young with:
Suzanne Young Australia
Bart Cambré Belgium
Derek S. Pugh United Kingdom
Elizabeth Goodrick United States
Brian C. Aldrich United States
Sue R. Faerman United States
Cathy Sheehan Australia
Ing‐Chung Huang Taiwan
Wendy S. Harman United States
Jeff Hyman United Kingdom
Peter Steane relative to Suzanne Young Australia Suzanne Young's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Suzanne Young · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Steane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Steane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Steane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Steane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Steane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Steane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Steane. The network helps show where Peter Steane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Steane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Steane Line = papers co-authored together Peter Steane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003136
2 2018110
3 201687
4 200162
5 200250
6 200940
7 200140
8 200034
9 200032
10 200131
11 200931
12 199728
13 200924
14 200621
15 200718
16 201218
17 199717
18 200815
19 201315
20
Surviving your thesis
200414

About Peter Steane

Peter Steane is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, Public Administration, Finance and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Organizational Studies (10 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (8 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (8 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (8 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (6 papers), Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies (6 papers), Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (5 papers) and Community Development and Social Impact (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (106 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (227 citations), Strategy and Management (304 citations), Research and Theory (11 citations) and Management Information Systems (127 citations). Peter Steane has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James E. Guthrie, Elizabeth A. More, Michael Christie, Anne L. Fletcher, Stephen Pike, Göran Roos, Defne Demir, John Rodwell, Andrew James Noblet and Lawrence R. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Public Management Review, Health Care Management Review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, International Journal of Public Administration and Journal of Organizational Change Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact