Peter Steane

1.5k citations
68 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Steane

65 papers receiving 913 citations

Peers

Peter Steane
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Public Administration 109
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 239
  • Strategy and Management 325
  • Research and Theory 11
  • Management Information Systems 132
Replace Elizabeth Goodrick with:
Elizabeth Goodrick United States
Sue R. Faerman United States
Derek Pugh United Kingdom
Brian C. Aldrich United States
Bart Cambré Belgium
Greg J. Bamber Australia
Janice C. Molloy United States
Cathy Sheehan Australia
Wendy S. Harman United States
Jeff Hyman United Kingdom
Peter Steane relative to Elizabeth Goodrick United States Elizabeth Goodrick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Elizabeth Goodrick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Steane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Steane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Steane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Steane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Steane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Steane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Steane. The network helps show where Peter Steane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Steane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Steane Line = papers co-authored together Peter Steane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003148
2 2018103
3 201684
4 200166
5 200251
6 200147
7 200939
8 200135
9 200034
10 200033
11 199732
12 200930
13 200924
14 200622
15 199718
16 200718
17 201218
18
Surviving Your Thesis
200418
19 201316
20 200816

About Peter Steane

Peter Steane is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Public Administration and Finance, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Organizational Studies (10 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (9 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (8 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (8 papers), Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (6 papers), Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies (6 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (6 papers) and Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (109 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (239 citations), Strategy and Management (325 citations), Research and Theory (11 citations) and Management Information Systems (132 citations). Peter Steane has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include James Guthrie, Elizabeth More, Michael Christie, Göran Roos, Anne Fletcher, Stephen Pike, John Rodwell, Defne Demir, Andrew Noblet and L. R. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Management History, Health Care Management Review, International Journal of Public Administration, Journal of Organizational Change Management and Journal of Intellectual Capital.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact