Public Management Review

1.7k papers and 50.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Public Management Review in the last decades have received a total of 50.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Public Management Review usually cover Public Administration (892 papers), Sociology and Political Science (563 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (469 papers) specifically the topics of Public Policy and Administration Research (868 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (301 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (189 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Public Management Review are Stephen P. Osborne, John M. Bryson, Victor Bekkers, Lars Tummers, Erik‐Hans Klijn, Victor Pestoff, Jacob Torfing, Christopher Pollitt, John Alford and Wouter Vandenabeele.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Public Management Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Public Management Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Public Management Review.

Countries where authors publish in Public Management Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Public Management Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Public Management Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Public Management Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025