Journal of Intellectual Capital

1.0k papers and 51.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in Journal of Intellectual Capital in the last decades have received a total of 51.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Intellectual Capital usually cover Strategy and Management (892 papers), Accounting (256 papers) and Management of Technology and Innovation (114 papers) specifically the topics of Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (785 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (475 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (187 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Intellectual Capital are Nick Bontis, John Dumay, James Guthrie, Richard Petty, Indra Abeysekera, S. Mitchell Williams, Patricia Ordóñez de Pablos, G. Bharathi Kamath, Karl‐Erik Sveiby and Federica Ricceri.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Intellectual Capital

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Intellectual Capital. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Intellectual Capital.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Intellectual Capital

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Intellectual Capital. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Intellectual Capital with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Intellectual Capital more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025