Peter K. Ahnelt

3.3k citations
49 papers · 2.4k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Peter K. Ahnelt

48 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Peter K. Ahnelt
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Ophthalmology 737
  • Biophysics 184
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 547
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 468
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 407
Replace Martin Hammer with:
Martin Hammer Germany
Jay M. Enoch United States
Ann E. Elsner United States
A. Hughes Australia
Heidi Hofer United States
Benjamin E. Reese United States
Adam M. Dubis United Kingdom
Andrew Stockman United Kingdom
Daniel G. Green United States
Joseph Carroll United States
Peter K. Ahnelt relative to Martin Hammer Germany Martin Hammer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Martin Hammer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter K. Ahnelt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter K. Ahnelt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter K. Ahnelt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter K. Ahnelt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter K. Ahnelt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter K. Ahnelt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter K. Ahnelt. The network helps show where Peter K. Ahnelt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter K. Ahnelt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter K. Ahnelt Line = papers co-authored together Peter K. Ahnelt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000206
2 1987195
3 2003183
4 2006168
5 2004150
6 2003116
7 2008110
8 2009108
9 199082
10 200880
11 199477
12 200577
13 200469
14 200368
15 199466
16 199860
17 199455
18 198552
19 200151
20 200639

About Peter K. Ahnelt

Peter K. Ahnelt is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 49 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (28 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (13 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (12 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (11 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (10 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (4 papers) and Retinal and Macular Surgery (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (737 citations), Biophysics (184 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (547 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (468 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (407 citations). Peter K. Ahnelt has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Helga Kolb, Wolfgang Drexler, Harald Sattmann, R. Pflug, Christian Schubert, Angelika Unterhuber, Boris Považay, Boris Hermann, E. Anger and B. Hermann. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Visual Neuroscience, Experimental Eye Research, Optics Express and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact