Michael Stur

2.2k citations
85 papers · 1.8k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Stur

78 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Michael Stur
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Ophthalmology 1.2k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 517
  • Biochemistry 50
  • Biophysics 34
  • Parasitology 29
Replace Robert Haimovici with:
Robert Haimovici United States
Barbara Parolini Italy
Leopoldo Spadea Italy
Boris Edvard Malyugin Russia
Brian C. Joondeph United States
Valentín Huerva Spain
Eric K. Chin United States
Ramiro S. Maldonado United States
Federico Maria Grignolo Italy
Raghavan Lavanya Singapore
Michael Stur relative to Robert Haimovici United States Robert Haimovici's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.8×
Robert Haimovici · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Stur

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Stur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Stur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Stur more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Stur

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Stur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Stur. The network helps show where Michael Stur may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Stur, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Stur Line = papers co-authored together Michael Stur links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003248
2 2004141
3 2005100
4 201091
5 200290
6
Oral zinc and the second eye in age-related macular degeneration.
199688
7 200585
8 200379
9 200573
10 200662
11 200448
12 200144
13 200042
14 200641
15 200540
16 200539
17 200538
18 199236
19 200533
20 198832

About Michael Stur

Michael Stur is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, Epidemiology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 85 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (37 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (11 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (7 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (6 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (5 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (5 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (5 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (1.2k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (517 citations), Biochemistry (50 citations), Biophysics (34 citations) and Parasitology (29 citations). Michael Stur has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ergün Erdem, Noémi Maár, Jason S. Slakter, Michael Tittl, Andreas Reitner, Vanee Meisinger, Christoph D. Scholda, Matthias G. Wirtitsch, Wolfgang Radner and Siamak Ansari Shahrezaei. Their work appears in journals such as Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Retina and Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact