Heidi Hofer

2.5k citations
23 papers · 1.8k · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Heidi Hofer

21 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Heidi Hofer
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Ophthalmology 597
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 518
  • Epidemiology 749
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 481
  • Biophysics 98
Replace Melanie C. W. Campbell with:
Melanie C. W. Campbell Canada
Ann E. Elsner United States
Ramkumar Sabesan United States
Andrew Metha Australia
Jay M. Enoch United States
J. J. Vos Netherlands
Peter K. Ahnelt Austria
Nathan Doble United States
Yusufu N. Sulai United States
Robert F. Cooper United States
Heidi Hofer relative to Melanie C. W. Campbell Canada Melanie C. W. Campbell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Melanie C. W. Campbell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Heidi Hofer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Heidi Hofer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heidi Hofer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heidi Hofer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Heidi Hofer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heidi Hofer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heidi Hofer. The network helps show where Heidi Hofer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Heidi Hofer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Heidi Hofer Line = papers co-authored together Heidi Hofer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005294
2 2001274
3 2001200
4 2004187
5 2003146
6 2005144
7 2000143
8 2005100
9 200680
10 201172
11 201548
12 200839
13 201138
14 200210
15 19728
16 20124
17
Organization of the Human Trichromatic Cone Mosaic
20033
18 20122
19 20101
20 20141

About Heidi Hofer

Heidi Hofer is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (14 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (14 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (8 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (4 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (3 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (3 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (3 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (597 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (518 citations), Epidemiology (749 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (481 citations) and Biophysics (98 citations). Heidi Hofer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Spain. Frequent co-authors include David R. Williams, Ben Singer, Joseph Carroll, Jay Neitz, Maureen Neitz, Geunyoung Yoon, Pablo Artal, Juan L. Aragón, Aristofanis I. Pallikaris and Jason Porter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vision, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Vision Research and Optics Express.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact