Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

1.3M papers and 50.6M indexed citations i.

About

1.3M papers covering Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience have received a total of 50.6M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research, Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research and also cover the fields of Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Physiology. Some of the most active scholars covering Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience are György Buzsáki, George F. Koob, Solomon H. Snyder, Trevor W. Robbins, Fred H. Gage, Eric J. Nestler, William A. Catterall, Robert C. Malenka, Roger A. Nicoll and Dennis W. Choi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

Countries where authors publish papers about Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025