Daniel G. Green

2.6k citations
50 papers · 2.1k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel G. Green

50 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Daniel G. Green
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Ophthalmology 393
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 816
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 585
  • Sensory Systems 81
  • Molecular Biology 1.0k
Replace John Robson with:
John Robson United States
Orin Packer United States
A. Hughes Australia
K.H. Ruddock United Kingdom
K.J. Sanderson Australia
Margarete Tigges United States
F. M. de Monasterio United States
M.L.J. Crawford United States
Peter K. Ahnelt Austria
Richard C. Van Sluyters United States
Daniel G. Green relative to John Robson United States John Robson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
John Robson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel G. Green

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel G. Green's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel G. Green with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel G. Green more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel G. Green

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel G. Green. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel G. Green. The network helps show where Daniel G. Green may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel G. Green, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel G. Green Line = papers co-authored together Daniel G. Green links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980187
2 1970142
3 1994133
4 1968130
5 1999129
6 1971114
7 199596
8 196986
9 200173
10 197162
11 197361
12 199855
13 197054
14 197853
15 199952
16 199950
17 196749
18 199646
19 199242
20 197241

About Daniel G. Green

Daniel G. Green is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ophthalmology and Epidemiology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (24 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (19 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (16 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (9 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (7 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (6 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (393 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (816 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (585 citations), Sensory Systems (81 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.0k citations). Daniel G. Green has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Maureen K. Powers, NATALIA V. KAPOUSTA-BRUNEAU, Martin S. Banks, Pablo Artal, P. Tejada, Ignacio Iglesias, Carol M. Cicerone, Norberto López‐Gil, Paul A. Sieving and John E. Dowling. Their work appears in journals such as Vision Research, Visual Neuroscience, The Journal of Physiology, Science and Journal of the Optical Society of America A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact