Ann E. Elsner

130 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

Ann E. Elsner
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Ophthalmology 1.8k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.1k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 645
  • Biophysics 162
  • Biomedical Engineering 769
Replace Heidi Hofer with:
Heidi Hofer United States
Stephen A. Burns United States
Melanie C. W. Campbell Canada
Andrew Metha Australia
François C. Delori United States
Donald C. Hood United States
Junzhong Liang United States
Adam M. Dubis United Kingdom
Jane F. Koretz United States
Ramkumar Sabesan United States
Ann E. Elsner relative to Heidi Hofer United States Heidi Hofer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Heidi Hofer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ann E. Elsner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann E. Elsner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann E. Elsner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann E. Elsner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann E. Elsner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann E. Elsner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann E. Elsner. The network helps show where Ann E. Elsner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ann E. Elsner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ann E. Elsner Line = papers co-authored together Ann E. Elsner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 137 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996249
2 2011211
3 2018190
4 1996184
5 2007161
6 1984119
7 2014115
8 1995102
9 201498
10
Foveal cone photopigment distribution: small alterations associated with macular pigment distribution.
199886
11 200884
12 199283
13 199278
14 200878
15 199674
16 201770
17 198562
18 198261
19 199355
20 200349

About Ann E. Elsner

Ann E. Elsner is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 137 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (43 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (41 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (31 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (26 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (25 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (18 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (16 papers) and Color Science and Applications (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (1.8k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.1k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (645 citations), Biophysics (162 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (769 citations). Ann E. Elsner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Stephen A. Burns, John J. Weiter, M. Elizabeth Hartnett, Toco Yuen Ping Chui, François C. Delori, Dean A. VanNasdale, Thomas Gast, Robert H. Webb, Masahiro Miura and Shuang Wu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Optometry and Vision Science, Vision Research and Optics Express.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact