Ping Qiu

2.3k citations
99 papers · 1.8k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Ping Qiu

92 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Ping Qiu
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Electrochemistry 115
  • Materials Chemistry 655
  • Bioengineering 27
  • Analytical Chemistry 110
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 134
Replace Shuang Zhao with:
Shuang Zhao China
Yong Qiong Wang China
Ding Jiang China
Yu Du China
Deia Abd El‐Hady Saudi Arabia
Jinghui Zhu China
Wenting Li China
Xiaogang Luo China
Shuqing Dong China
Ping Qiu relative to Shuang Zhao China Shuang Zhao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Shuang Zhao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping Qiu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Qiu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Qiu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Qiu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Qiu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Qiu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Qiu. The network helps show where Ping Qiu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping Qiu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping Qiu Line = papers co-authored together Ping Qiu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 99 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202287
2 200483
3 201883
4 201177
5 200567
6 202160
7 201458
8 201851
9 201850
10 202345
11 202344
12 201742
13 202342
14 202141
15 202341
16 202441
17 202540
18 201639
19 202339
20 202032

About Ping Qiu

Ping Qiu is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Electrochemistry, Analytical Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Spectroscopy, having authored 99 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis (32 papers), Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (14 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (11 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (9 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (8 papers), Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications (8 papers), Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (8 papers) and Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrochemistry (115 citations), Materials Chemistry (655 citations), Bioengineering (27 citations), Analytical Chemistry (110 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (134 citations). Ping Qiu has collaborated with scholars based in China, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Serge Kokot A, Yongnian Ni, Zoujun Peng, Xiaomin Tang, Xiaolei Wang, Peng Xu, Tao Lian, Jian-Ding Qiu, Ru‐Ping Liang and Fan Li. Their work appears in journals such as Talanta, Spectrochimica Acta Part A Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, Analytica Chimica Acta, Microchemical Journal and Sensors and Actuators B Chemical.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact