N. Bhaskar
Impact in
- Aquatic Science top 0.1%
- Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
- Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
- Animal Science and Zoology top 0.5%
- Meat and Animal Product Quality
Papers in
-
- Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides 29
-
- Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth 17
- Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds 7
- Co-authors
- N.M. Sachindra (10 shared papers)S Chandini (2 shared papers)N. S. Mahendrakar (10 shared papers)P. V. Suresh (8 shared papers)Chandini S. Kumar (1 shared paper)P. Z. Sakhare (11 shared papers)C. Radha (2 shared papers)Palanivel Ganesan (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
N. Bhaskar
58 papers receiving 3.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Aquatic Science 1.7k
- Animal Science and Zoology 627
- Biochemistry 301
- Food Science 888
- Biotechnology 393
Countries citing papers authored by N. Bhaskar
This map shows the geographic impact of N. Bhaskar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Bhaskar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Bhaskar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by N. Bhaskar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Bhaskar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Bhaskar. The network helps show where N. Bhaskar may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. Bhaskar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 358 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 335 | |
| 3 | Seaweeds as a source of nutritionally beneficial compounds - A review | 2008 | 253 |
| 4 | 2008 | 251 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 242 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 183 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 169 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 136 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 114 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 103 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 102 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 98 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 98 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 77 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 67 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 66 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 62 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 57 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 54 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 52 |
About N. Bhaskar
N. Bhaskar is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Aquatic Science, Animal Science and Zoology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Food Science, having authored 58 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (29 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (19 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (17 papers), Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds (7 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (7 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (6 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (6 papers) and Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aquatic Science (1.7k citations), Animal Science and Zoology (627 citations), Biochemistry (301 citations), Food Science (888 citations) and Biotechnology (393 citations). N. Bhaskar has collaborated with scholars based in India, Japan and Cameroon. Frequent co-authors include N.M. Sachindra, S Chandini, N. S. Mahendrakar, P. V. Suresh, Chandini S. Kumar, P. Z. Sakhare, C. Radha, Palanivel Ganesan, Vallikannan Baskaran and Tanaji G. Kudre. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Food Science and Technology, Bioresource Technology, Food Chemistry, Enzyme and Microbial Technology and Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.