Monica Geist

14 papers receiving 595 citations

Peers

Monica Geist
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Architecture 20
  • Conservation 22
  • Education 191
  • Health 40
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 26
Replace Linda B. Nilson with:
Linda B. Nilson United States
Reginald Lee United States
Ernest T. Stringer United States
Diane Gillespie United States
Ananda Mitra United States
Martina Feilzer United Kingdom
Chareen Snelson United States
Diane P. Janes Canada
Swapna Kumar United States
Dorothy Williams United Kingdom
Monica Geist relative to Linda B. Nilson United States Linda B. Nilson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Linda B. Nilson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Monica Geist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Monica Geist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Monica Geist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Monica Geist more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Monica Geist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Monica Geist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Monica Geist. The network helps show where Monica Geist may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Monica Geist, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Monica Geist Line = papers co-authored together Monica Geist links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2009194
2 2011101
3 201078
4 200961
5 201150
6
Rigorous Methodology for Concept Inventory Development: Using the 'Assessment Triangle' to Develop and Test the Thermal and Transport Science Concept Inventory (TTCI)*
201144
7 201140
8 202015
9 201614
10
HARP: The Hybrid Automated Reliability Predictor
198514
11 202014
12 202011
13 20179
14 20216

About Monica Geist

Monica Geist is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Education, Health, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 651 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (4 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (3 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (3 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers), Various Chemistry Research Topics (1 paper) and Risk and Safety Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Architecture (20 citations), Conservation (22 citations), Education (191 citations), Health (40 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (26 citations). Monica Geist has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Maria K. E. Lahman, Katrina L. Rodriguez, Jana L. Schwartz, David C. Webb, Veronica M. Richard, Mary Nelson, Ruth Streveler, Barbara Olds, Ronald L. Miller and Karen Mason. Their work appears in journals such as Qualitative Inquiry, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Quality & Quantity, Evaluation and Program Planning and International journal of engineering education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact