Architecture

27.4k papers and 186.6k indexed citations i.

About

27.4k papers covering Architecture have received a total of 186.6k indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Architecture and Computational Design, Engineering Education and Pedagogy and Experimental Learning in Engineering and also cover the fields of Media Technology, Mechanical Engineering and Building and Construction. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Mechanical Engineering, Building and Construction and Education. Some of the most active scholars covering Architecture are Douglas C. Montgomery, Melvin Alexander, George C. Runger, Rivka Oxman, Donald A. Schön, Jonathan Adams, Richard M. Felder, Ralph Evins, Michael Benedikt and Catarina Thormark.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Architecture

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Architecture. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Architecture.

Countries where authors publish papers about Architecture

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Architecture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Architecture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Architecture more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025