Quality & Quantity

3.6k papers and 67.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.6k papers published in Quality & Quantity in the last decades have received a total of 67.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Quality & Quantity usually cover Sociology and Political Science (1.0k papers), Economics and Econometrics (755 papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (469 papers) specifically the topics of Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (126 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (124 papers) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (123 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Quality & Quantity are Robert M. O’Brien, Hennie Boeije, Ivar Krumpal, Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie, David Byrne, Nancy L. Leech, Julius Sim, Jackie Waterfield, Bernadette Bartlam and Clare Jinks.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Quality & Quantity

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Quality & Quantity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Quality & Quantity.

Countries where authors publish in Quality & Quantity

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Quality & Quantity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Quality & Quantity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quality & Quantity more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025