Mitchell Ness

1.7k citations
40 papers · 1.2k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Mitchell Ness

38 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Mitchell Ness
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 205
  • Marketing 337
  • Food Science 389
  • Business and International Management 25
  • Plant Science 439
Replace Alessio Cavicchi with:
Alessio Cavicchi Italy
Sharron Kuznesof United Kingdom
Fabio Boncinelli Italy
Lisa House United States
Lucie Sirieix France
Oral Capps United States
Barbara Almanza United States
Alexandra E. Lobb United Kingdom
Susan W. Arendt United States
Damien Mather New Zealand
Mitchell Ness relative to Alessio Cavicchi Italy Alessio Cavicchi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Alessio Cavicchi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell Ness

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell Ness's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell Ness with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell Ness more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell Ness

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell Ness. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell Ness. The network helps show where Mitchell Ness may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell Ness, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell Ness Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell Ness links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003210
2 2003145
3 2004120
4 2005102
5 2002101
6 199459
7 200559
8 200649
9 200944
10 199942
11 200841
12 200435
13 199130
14 199228
15 200228
16 200627
17 200423
18 199717
19 201111
20 200510

About Mitchell Ness

Mitchell Ness is a scholar working on Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Plant Science, Food Science and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (12 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (10 papers), Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (10 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (9 papers), Wine Industry and Tourism (7 papers), Cognitive and psychological constructs research (4 papers), Risk Perception and Management (4 papers) and Culinary Culture and Tourism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (205 citations), Marketing (337 citations), Food Science (389 citations), Business and International Management (25 citations) and Plant Science (439 citations). Mitchell Ness has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Greece and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Athanasios Krystallis, Christos Fotopoulos, Mary Brennan, Lynn J. Frewer, Christopher Ritson, Sharron Kuznesof, Li‐Wei Mai, Angela Tregear, Susan Miles and Steve Hunt. Their work appears in journals such as British Food Journal, Food Quality and Preference, Journal of Marketing Management, Journal of International Consumer Marketing and Public Understanding of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact