Melanie Gray

436 citations
5 papers · 312 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Melanie Gray

5 papers receiving 271 citations

Peers

Melanie Gray
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 135
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 88
  • Public Administration 17
  • Strategy and Management 62
  • Accounting 39
Replace Edward W. Rogers with:
Edward W. Rogers United States
June G. Morita United States
Ashlea Kellner Australia
Elaine Whitby United Kingdom
Nir N. Brueller Israel
Michael Zanko Australia
Sjoerd van den Heuvel Netherlands
Lyonel Laulié Chile
Mike Doyle United Kingdom
Subrena Harris United Kingdom
Melanie Gray relative to Edward W. Rogers United States Edward W. Rogers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Edward W. Rogers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Melanie Gray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melanie Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melanie Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melanie Gray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melanie Gray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melanie Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melanie Gray. The network helps show where Melanie Gray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Melanie Gray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Melanie Gray Line = papers co-authored together Melanie Gray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1 2002218
2 200252
3 202221
4 201019
5
Student Satisfaction As an Outcome of The Frequency And Type of Teacher Interaction In Online Courses
20162

About Melanie Gray

Melanie Gray is a scholar working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Control and Systems Engineering, having authored 5 papers that have together received 312 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Occupational Health and Safety Research (1 paper), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (1 paper), Human Resource and Talent Management (1 paper), Technology-Enhanced Education Studies (1 paper), Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications (1 paper), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (1 paper), Online and Blended Learning (1 paper) and Organizational Downsizing and Restructuring (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (135 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (88 citations), Public Administration (17 citations), Strategy and Management (62 citations) and Accounting (39 citations). Melanie Gray has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Chris Clegg, Catherine M. Cassell, Sara J. Nadin, Patrick E. Waterson, G. Neil Thomas, Abd A. Tahrani, Rebecca Etz, Shahrad Taheri and Bergen Ballard Nelson. Their work appears in journals such as Personnel Review, American Journal of Men s Health, Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Academic Pediatrics and ProQuest LLC eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact