Mark Windschitl

8.2k citations
81 papers · 6.2k · 5 hit papers · h-index 31

Impact in

    • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
    • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Education top 0.05%
    • Science Education and Pedagogy
    • Education and Critical Thinking Development
    • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
    • Online and Blended Learning
    • Innovative Teaching Methods

Papers in

    • Science Education and Pedagogy 32
    • Education and Critical Thinking Development 17
    • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies 13
    • Online and Blended Learning 7
    • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods 27
    • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies 16

Mark Windschitl

78 papers receiving 5.4k citations

Mark Windschitl's Hit Papers

Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science 2012 · 476 citations
4760+8+16Years since publication250500750

Peers

Mark Windschitl
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 2.7k
  • Education 5.2k
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 550
  • Computer Science Applications 329
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 120
Replace Elizabeth A. Davis with:
Elizabeth A. Davis United States
Sandra K. Abell United States
Rodger W. Bybee United States
Peter W. Hewson United States
Derek Hodson Canada
Kenneth Tobin United States
Okhee Lee United States
Gillian Roehrig United States
Jàne Butler Kahle United States
Richard A. Duschl United States
Mark Windschitl relative to Elizabeth A. Davis United States Elizabeth A. Davis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Elizabeth A. Davis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Windschitl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Windschitl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Windschitl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Windschitl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Windschitl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Windschitl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Windschitl. The network helps show where Mark Windschitl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Windschitl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Windschitl Line = papers co-authored together Mark Windschitl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Framing Constructivism in Practice as the Negotiation of Dilemmas: An Analysis of the Conceptual, Pedagogical, Cultural, and Political Challenges Facing Teachers
Hit paper breakdown →
2002785
2
Beyond the scientific method: Model‐based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations
Hit paper breakdown →
2008694
3
Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science
Hit paper breakdown →
2012476
4
Tracing Teachers’ Use of Technology in a Laptop Computer School: The Interplay of Teacher Beliefs, Social Dynamics, and Institutional Culture
Hit paper breakdown →
2002441
5
Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice?
Hit paper breakdown →
2002431
6 1998283
7 2011275
8 2004245
9
Ambitious Science Teaching
2018230
10 2013189
11 2011159
12 1998155
13 2006134
14 2008128
15 1998125
16 2016109
17 201495
18 201693
19 201491
20 199889

About Mark Windschitl

Mark Windschitl is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Sociology and Political Science and Communication, having authored 81 papers that have together received 6.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Science Education and Pedagogy (32 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (27 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (17 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (16 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (13 papers), Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (11 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (8 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (2.7k citations), Education (5.2k citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (550 citations), Computer Science Applications (329 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (120 citations). Mark Windschitl has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jessica Thompson, Melissa Braaten, David Stroupe, Thomas André, Hosun Kang, K. A. Burke, Thomas J. Greenbowe, Angela Calabrese Barton, Christina V. Schwarz and Todd Campbell. Their work appears in journals such as Science Education, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education, American Educational Research Journal and Phi Delta Kappan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact