Phi Delta Kappan

6.2k papers and 62.0k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 6.2k papers published in Phi Delta Kappan in the last decades have received a total of 62.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Phi Delta Kappan usually cover Education (3.0k papers), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (444 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (401 papers) specifically the topics of Education Systems and Policy (594 papers), Diverse Education Studies and Reforms (592 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (582 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Phi Delta Kappan are Joyce L. Epstein, Linda Darling‐Hammond, Paul Black, Dylan Wiliam, Thomas R. Guskey, Joseph S. Renzulli, Milbrey Wallin McLaughlin, Richard J. Stiggins, Gerald W. Bracey and Grant Wiggins.

In The Last Decade

Phi Delta Kappan

3.3k papers receiving 36.7k citations

Fields of papers published in Phi Delta Kappan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Phi Delta Kappan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Phi Delta Kappan.

Countries where authors publish in Phi Delta Kappan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Phi Delta Kappan. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Phi Delta Kappan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phi Delta Kappan more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026