Kathryn E. Hoff

12 papers receiving 483 citations

Peers

Kathryn E. Hoff
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 355
  • Statistics and Probability 202
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 128
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 165
  • Education 208
Replace Gary L. Cates with:
Gary L. Cates United States
Lynn Meltzer United States
Patrizia Cimeli Switzerland
Marianne Röthlisberger Switzerland
Elena Ise Germany
Tam E. O'Shaughnessy United States
Donna Gilbertson United States
Nihal Yeniad Netherlands
Sara G. Tarver United States
Merilee McCurdy United States
Kathryn E. Hoff relative to Gary L. Cates United States Gary L. Cates's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Gary L. Cates · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kathryn E. Hoff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kathryn E. Hoff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathryn E. Hoff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathryn E. Hoff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kathryn E. Hoff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathryn E. Hoff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathryn E. Hoff. The network helps show where Kathryn E. Hoff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Kathryn E. Hoff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kathryn E. Hoff Line = papers co-authored together Kathryn E. Hoff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 1996129
2 2006114
3 199885
4 199982
5 199958
6 200949
7 200545
8 201216
9 20039
10
Schema-Based Instruction on Word Problem Solving Performance of Students with Learning Disabilities.
19953
11 19982
12
The Role of Schema-Based Instruction on Solving Multistep Word Problems.
19971

About Kathryn E. Hoff

Kathryn E. Hoff is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Education, having authored 12 papers that have together received 593 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (7 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (5 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (2 papers), Educational Methods and Media Use (2 papers) and Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (355 citations), Statistics and Probability (202 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (128 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (165 citations) and Education (208 citations). Kathryn E. Hoff has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Asha K. Jitendra, George J. DuPaul, Karla J. Doepke, Patrick C. Friman, Ruth A. Ervin, Marla Reese‐Weber, W. Joel Schneider, Douglas W. Woods, Nathan J. Blum and Kurt A. Freeman. Their work appears in journals such as School Psychology Review, Psychology in the Schools, Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, Journal of Learning Disabilities and Journal of School Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact