Joseph Glick

29 papers receiving 549 citations

Peers

Joseph Glick
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Condensed Matter Physics 242
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 165
  • General Psychology 10
  • Statistics and Probability 63
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 228
Replace M. Büchmeier with:
M. Büchmeier Germany
B. J. Wakefield United Kingdom
Mark D. Jackson United States
Kôichi Yokosawa Japan
David A. van Leeuwen Netherlands
Kleanthes Κ. Grohmann Cyprus
Kenneth Hay United States
Eric D. Jones United States
Osamu Takeuchi Japan
Joseph Glick relative to M. Büchmeier Germany M. Büchmeier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.5×
M. Büchmeier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Glick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Glick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Glick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Glick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Glick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Glick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Glick. The network helps show where Joseph Glick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joseph Glick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joseph Glick Line = papers co-authored together Joseph Glick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016158
2 1984105
3 201838
4 197134
5 196831
6 201828
7 196723
8 197222
9 199518
10 199217
11 196815
12 201613
13 201713
14 202012
15 196811
16 201711
17 19659
18 20139
19 19769
20 19685

About Joseph Glick

Joseph Glick is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Social Psychology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 601 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (6 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (5 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (4 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (4 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (3 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers) and School Choice and Performance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (242 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (165 citations), General Psychology (10 citations), Statistics and Probability (63 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (228 citations). Joseph Glick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include R. Loloee, Norman O. Birge, W. P. Pratt, Bethany M. Niedzielski, Roy Pea, Sylvia Scribner, Seymour Wapner, Michael Cole, Eric C. Gingrich and Yixing Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Psychology, Physical review. B., Early Childhood Education Journal, Child Development and Acta Psychologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact