Mark D. Jackson

850 citations
15 papers · 729 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Mark D. Jackson

15 papers receiving 612 citations

Peers

Mark D. Jackson
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 352
  • Geophysics 197
  • Statistics and Probability 116
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 112
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 159
Replace James Day with:
James Day Canada
David K. Sewell Australia
Paula R. L. Heron United States
Moti Salti Israel
Nancy Ewald Jackson United States
Rob Waring United States
Donia R. Scott United Kingdom
Joseph Glick United States
Eric D. Jones United States
J. R. Maclean United Kingdom
Mark D. Jackson relative to James Day Canada James Day's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
James Day · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark D. Jackson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark D. Jackson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark D. Jackson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark D. Jackson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark D. Jackson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark D. Jackson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark D. Jackson. The network helps show where Mark D. Jackson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Mark D. Jackson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark D. Jackson Line = papers co-authored together Mark D. Jackson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1979290
2 1987123
3 198068
4 197564
5 198562
6 198430
7 197920
8 198818
9 198818
10 199812
11 19887
12 19787
13 19917
14
Modified electron gas modelings of calcite and aragonite; comparison of polarizable anion and fully ionic methods
19942
15 19911

About Mark D. Jackson

Mark D. Jackson is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Geophysics, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 15 papers that have together received 729 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (4 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (4 papers), Crystal Structures and Properties (3 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (2 papers), Clay minerals and soil interactions (1 paper), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (1 paper) and Geological Modeling and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (352 citations), Geophysics (197 citations), Statistics and Probability (116 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (112 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (159 citations). Mark D. Jackson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James L. McClelland, Roy G. Gordon, Russell J. Hemley and G. V. Gibbs. Their work appears in journals such as Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Journal of Experimental Psychology General, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and American Mineralogist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact