Acta Psychologica

5.7k papers and 145.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.7k papers published in Acta Psychologica in the last decades have received a total of 145.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Acta Psychologica usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (3.1k papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.5k papers) and Social Psychology (1.3k papers) specifically the topics of Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (1.2k papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (823 papers) and Motor Control and Adaptation (507 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta Psychologica are Saul Sternberg, Jan Theeuwes, Ola Svenson, Adam Kendon, Dan Zakay, Paul Eling, A.F. Sanders, Risto Näätänen, Berry Wijers and Franciscus Cornelis Donders.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Acta Psychologica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta Psychologica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta Psychologica.

Countries where authors publish in Acta Psychologica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta Psychologica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta Psychologica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta Psychologica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025